My Personal Benefit from the Ackland Art Museum – Jonathan Burch

While battling my way through the wall of rain and dodging hidden water mines, I couldn’t help but think “should I skip today?”.  After much, much thought, I decided I will go to the Ackland Art Museum but only to keep my perfect attendance for the extra credit.  It never once came to my mind that I might actually enjoy this experience at the art museum?.  However, following the tours from both of our guides, I was surprisingly very pleased and intrigued by what we were shown.  I knew that adaptations could take the form of paintings and pictures, but I never actually observed one myself.   Between the two tours, I was able to dive deep into the painting and analyze what the story was trying to say.  The two paintings that seemed to adapt the original and best portray a story were the paintings we saw upstairs adapting the famous “Adam and Eve” narrative. 

The paintings adapting “Adam and Eve” may have been the most intriguing to me simply because they were taking ideas from a story I already knew.  However, even if this was not the case, I think these works of art still depicted the most meaning.  The first “Adam and Eve” painting appeared to tell the entire biblical story.  I felt that anyone could look at the painting and at least get the general idea of “Adam and Eve”.  The second adaptation considerably changed the original work with the exclusion of Adam and the portrayal of Eve with a darker skin tone.  Even though the story here is much different, it offers a very strong meaning relating to African culture and their interpretation of the Bible. 

Overall, my experience at the Ackland Art Museum taught me to look for the underlying meaning of visual art while also analyzing for potential adaptations of different works.  Without this class at the art museum, I would likely have continued to quickly glance at artwork and only admire their appearances. 

Third Blog Post: Ackland Visit

Before our tour of the Ackland Art Museum it wasn’t clear to me what an english class could learn from looking at artwork. However, my group had a wonderful tour guide who provided insight into how the concept of adaptation can be applied to paintings. The two most memorable paintings for me were Looking at the Sea and Eve and the Serpent.

Looking at the Sea is an abstract painting, and initially I did not realize that it could be depicting the ocean. When I first saw this painting I thought it looked like someone had tossed a stone into a pond. I also thought the streaks of tan and orange in the upper corner was a reflection of objects on the pond’s shore. Once our tour guide explained that the artist’s title indicates it could be seen as the unruly sea I saw the painting in a different light. Suddenly the swirls of blue at the bottom of the canvas looked like waves in the ocean, and my mind was immediately taken back to the story of Robinson Crusoe attempting to sail in the storm. This experience caused me to reflect on the term adaptation in regards to abstract paintings. Since abstract art does not directly depict an image the meaning of the work can be interpreted by the viewer. If I was viewing this painting alone I might have never considered the painting to look like the sea if I didn’t read the title Looking at the Sea. If an adaptation reframes a work would different interpretations of what is shown in abstract art be considered the beginnings of adaptation?

Our group looked at Eve and the Serpent after viewing another painting that depicted the story of Adam and Eve. I thought this painting was an intriguing adaptation of the biblical story and the bright colors captured my attention. At first I was unsure about the author’s motivation for choosing to paint Eve as an African American, but our tour guide addressed this concept by explaining that the painting’s title references the slave song “Dem Bones”. Once I knew about the slave spiritual I could see that this adaption reframed the story of Adam and Eve to reference the ideals of social injustice and slavery. Perhaps Rose Piper’s choice of not including Adam in this painting also represents a message about oppression, but instead focuses on the oppression of women, not just African Americans. Adam’s absence could represent the strong independence of women from the oppression of men. Overall I thought the trip to the Ackland was very insightful and helped me realize how a painting, without the supplementary details movies and books provide, can be an adaptation that sends a unique and detailed message from its creator about the source referenced or societal ideals.

Even a Creature Deserves Rights

Throughout history there has been a debate about who and what deserves to have rights. Humans have had to fight for their rights for centuries. People have been enslaved because of their skin color, their religion, or because they were conquered. Women had to fight for rights until the 20thcentury and continue to struggle in countries and cultures around the world. The fight for rights even extends to other living things like animals and plants. There are certain rights that most people would agree that living things, especially humans, deserve. One of the most basic is the right to keep living once life begins. The creature in Mary Shelley’s Frankensteinis considered to be alive, so does he deserve to be given rights? I would argue that the creature does deserve to have rights.

Frankenstein’s creature is depicted as an unnatural being wrongly brought into the world by Victor in his quest to discover the source of life. The creature is considered hideous even though the most beautiful parts were used in his creation. Victor quickly abandons his creation when he becomes sick from creating something unnatural. We fail to see the creature as anything besides a monster because Victor refuses to acknowledge him or even provide him with a name. Although the creature is disfigured, he appears to act as an infant learning how to move his body. Even though the creature is created from previously deceased parts, he is still a living being with the capacity to learn.

Victor’s creature continues to learn, mastering basic skills for survival to intricate skills like speaking. He develops emotions and moral thinking. A hideous, unnatural creation is able to feel as if he were more human than his creator. The creature pleads with Victor to acknowledge him as a human and to treat him justly with the rights he deserves. He says, “Listen to my tale: when you have heard that, abandon or commiserate me, as you shall judge that I deserve. But hear me. The guilty are allowed, by human laws, bloody as they may be, to speak in their own defense before they are condemned. Listen to me, Frankenstein. You accuse me of murder; and yet you would with a satisfied conscience destroy your own creature. Oh praise the eternal justice of man.” This quote is unique because it highlights that Victor cannot condemn the creature of his crimes of killing without first acknowledging that he is human. We do not view a bear or another type of predator as a criminal if they are provoked to kill a human. A bear cannot be judged because they lack the ability to discern between right and wrong. Yet people acknowledge that the bear has a right to life. The creature gained the right to live when Victor brought him to life. If Victor destroyed his creation, then he would be no less a murderer than the creature and justice would not exist.

Once Victor supplied life to the body he created, the creature deserved certain rights. He had the right to be acknowledged as living and to be given guidance. We do not expect children to be abandoned by their parents and we do not deny rights to those with disfigurements. If Frankenstein made the creature into an unnatural monster, then the creature was able to make himself human.

 

 

Eve, the Serpent, and Slavery

 

The most interested piece of artwork I saw at the Ackland Art Museum was Eve and the Serpent by Rose Piper. This painting depicts the version of the biblical creation story that is told through the slave spiritual “Dem Bones (Gonna Rise Again).” Besides the painting’s title and the author’s choice to represent Eve as an African American, the only distinctive feature of this painting that nods to the song is the serpent’s winking eye.

In many adaptations of the creation story, Eve is often portrayed as intentionally disobedient or naïve and child-like. However, in this painting, Eve is dignified. Her posture is that of a confident woman, and even the animals are drawn to her. In this adaptation, she also seems more curious in the serpent than in the fruit. This painting depicts the moments just before Eve takes the forbidden fruit and while the vivid colors, flowers, and friendly animals give the painting a happy, fairytale feel, the ominous dark clouds in the top, left corner foreshadow the story’s ending.

The slave spiritual that this painting originates from was one of many that were often sung by slaves as they worked the cotton fields. The lyrics tell the story of Adam and Eve but the last lines to the song are particularly interesting: “So Adam took a pick and then took a plow, And that’s why we’re workin’ now!” Not only did this song help African Americans pass time during long hours of manual labor, it helped them share religious stories and make sense of the senseless oppression they were experiencing. Piper’s choice to link this spiritual to her painting draws deeper meaning into her work. Not only is she illustrating the creation story, but she is also representing all the men, women, and children who sang those words during one of the darkest times in US history.

Where’s Adam?

In Rose Piper’s Eve and the Serpent, she’s managed to construct an interesting adaptation and one that was entirely new to me. While the main theme presented in her painting was immediately and easily identifiable I feel that it’s noteworthy that she’s incorporated more elements than adaptation alone. She’s utilized intertextuality in the title of her painting to include Dem Bones (Gonna Rise Again), an old African-American Spiritual song; Dem Bones tells the story of Adam and Eve. By incorporating the song and the story of Adam and Eve she’s essentially created a visual bricolage, melding the original story and an adaptation of it together, creating her own adaptation in the process. Interestingly Piper chose to paint her adaptation minus Adam. With Adam being a central figure to the story I found it a curious decision, at first.

Then I stopped to consider who Rose Piper was. She was an African American woman that was born in 1917 and grew up in the Bronx, NY and drew upon influences from blues music in the 1940s and ’50s, during which time she painted some of her most notable works; Ackland has one such piece in circulation titled Slow Down, Freight Train. So it appears that Piper frequently drew upon music as the inspiration for her paintings.  It might be assumed that as a woman and an African American woman growing up before & during segregation,  and civil rights & women’s liberation movements, she felt marginalized.

Perhaps that’s part of the reason that she chose only to depict Eve and selected elements of Dem Bones to highlight some social issues that she had to deal with. In this way, her painting, Eve and the Serpent could almost be considered a parody as well. Piper seems to have masterfully taken multiple elements & sources and blended them together to create a truly unique adaptation to the story of Adam and Eve.

I think that the way in which Piper has chosen to incorporate the tree, snake and Eve into her painting and how she has portrayed the snake, in particular, is an interesting and refreshing adaptation on a story many know so well.

Adam and Eve vs. Fall of Man

 

The item that was the most perplexing to me at the Ackland museum was the “Fall of Man” painting. After thinking and thinking about why I couldn’t understand the painting, I concluded that it was because of the perspective I had going into the painting. Right before seeing this painting, we saw a painting that alluded to the Biblical story of Adam and Eve’s disobedience. The painting showed Adam and Eve standing near a tree and Eve reaching to grab a piece of fruit from a serpent wrapped around the tree. This is probably one of the most common depictions of the infamous Biblical event. When we went to view the “Fall of Man” our tour guide introduced the painting to us as “another interpretation of Adam and Eve.” This caused me to view the painting with a lense that I think didn’t allow me to fully understand it initially. This painting depicts a black woman petting a serpent that is wrapped around a tree. Surrounding them is a wide variety of animals and the tree was plentiful with fruit. The most salient things about the painting to me were Eve’s skin color and the fact that Adam was missing. I appreciated the colors and the details but I felt like I missed the central point. After thinking about the painting and it’s title a bit more I concluded that this painting wasn’t depicting Adam and Eve in a literal tangible manner. It was depicting the story of Adam and Eve more broader, more specifically the scene where Eve was alone being deceived by serpent before she ate the fruit. This explains why Adam wasn’t there and why things still look so peaceful. Also, upon deeper examination, it looks as if the serpent is winking. The wink was a foreshadowing tool representing the next scene which would be the scene where Eve actually eats the fruit. This misunderstanding reminded me that the same story can be depicted in so many ways depending on what part of the story is being told. It also reminded me that perspective can have a huge impact on the way you interpret things which can be a good or bad thing.

Eve and the Serpent

Within the Ackland Museum, there were various interesting collections. The one that called most to my attention was that of Eve and the Serpent (1988) by Rose Piper. The painting depicts the fall of man from the Bible in the eyes of the artist. There were various notable intertextual references between the original texts in which the painting was influenced by.

The story of the fall of man has to do with Satan (disguised as a deceitful serpent) approaching Eve (the first woman in existence) and convincing her to do wrong against God by disobeying the only rule set in place. In the painting, the serpent does not convey a deceitful or mischevious charater, but rather a more friendly and suductive personality. I derived this from the wink in which he sends miss’ Eve’s way, which is actually an appropriation recognized in the title of the art work from a well known American folk song named “Dem Bones.” So rather than pressuring, the snake is just more so coercive, not even carrying the apple in his mouth and handing it to Eve as many paintings convey. The original text relays that Eve chooses to pluck the apple from the tree on her own.

The detail and accuracy reenacted from the painting to the original story are quite interesting and amazing to see in the brought to life with vivid colors and even the incorporations of ideas from other work.

Ackland Art Museum

‘Confused, overwhelmed, rushed, and exasperated’ would be a few of the words that accurately encapsulated my mood during my first visit to the Ackland Art Museum. The different artworks seemed to continuously cascade all around me and each room seemed to develop a new identity once I returned. It felt as if I was trying to escape the most complicated labyrinth ever designed by man, and I was so eager to escape the never ending web of clay pots, paintings, and statues. Luckily, my second visit to the Ackland Art Museum was nothing like the last and allowed me to develop a new appreciation for the building and the artwork from within.

 

Instead of being on a time crunch and frantically running around trying to find different pieces of art in a Spanish scavenger hunt, I was actually able to learn the history behind some of the most historical pieces on display at this museum. I greatly appreciated the change of pace between my two experiences at this building, and rather than mindlessly looking at a piece of art for a few seconds before running to the next, I was actually able to absorb some important information behind the piece that completely morphed my interpretation of each presented work as a whole. One of the pieces that remained imprinted in my mind for the longest time was a piece called “Eve and the Serpent” by Rose Piper. This painting is an adaptation of the well known story of Adam and Eve, specifically portraying the moment right before the serpent persuaded Eve to disobey God and eat the forbidden fruit. This painting intrigued me due to its beautiful, vibrant color display (the color of the serpent being my favorite). I also thought that it was interesting how the painting relates to a song “Sarpent he Came Roun’ de Trunk; At Miss Eve his Eye he Wunk” which I feel could possibly be an element of intertextuality. It was also interesting how the artist decided to do an African spin-off of Eve to reflect her own person identity in a sense. In the top left corner, there is a shift between the blue, serene appearing clouds with dark, ominous, and foreboding ones foreshadow the turmoil that is about to occur once Eve eats the forbidden fruit. Rose Piper did an incredible job at capturing this story and putting her own twist and flare on it to separate it from other similar works which I greatly admire.

Overall, I appreciated this slow-paced tour of the museum and the background information provided for each piece. It really helped put certain elements into perspective and portray how individuality influences how art work can be differently perceived by everyone. If I were to ever be asked to provide the name of a great “tourist attraction” on the UNC campus, the Ackland Art Museum would definitely be at the top of my list.

The Ackland Art Museum

On Thursday, November 15, our class visited the Ackland Art Museum in Chapel Hill, NC. During our visit, we were divided into two groups, and we were led around to look at different works of art. All of the pieces of art that we looked at were very different from one another and very unique. Although they might not have had many similarities to each other, they each had their own story to tell. Inferences and conclusions could be made about each work based on what the subject matter of the work was, the way the artist chose to depict that subject matter, and the feelings that the audience of the work felt. Something that stood out to me while we were viewing the works of art is the way that connections can be drawn from art to the books that we have been reading throughout the semester. Although a lot of the art that we looked at was original, many of the pieces of art that we looked at were variations of existing themes of art that had already been created. It was interesting to see the way that the artist changed some things around from original works and created works of their own as well as thinking about what meanings the new art conveyed to the audience.

One of the most unique works that we looked at was titled “The Batture Ritual,” and it was a 25-minute video put together by Jeff Whetstone. The video captures a small section of the Mississippi River with passing boats and fishermen going down to the water’s edge. The mood of the video is peaceful, and this mood carries over to the audience who is observing it. The both natural and artificial lighting create a feeling of relaxation and simplicity, which is strengthened by the boats passing and fishermen. It brings back thoughts of simpler times, and serves as a reminder that they still exist.

A common depiction in the works that we viewed was water. It was interesting to see the way that water was depicted in such different ways. In one painting titled “Looking at the Sea,” by Howard Hodgkin, it was unclear that water was being represented in the first place. There were thick brushes of blue paint throughout the painting, and the borders were contained by a red frame that was painted on as well. This painting created a feeling of chaos and anxiety. Another painting titled “River Landscape with Fishermen” depicted peaceful water with a small town in the background. There were fishermen on the water, and everything was calm. I found it fascinating the different ways that the artists chose to depict water.

Lastly, another painting that stood out to me was “Eve and the Serpent.” This artist takes a very common theme, Eve in the Garden of Eden, and transforms it into something completely new and interesting. This painting depicts Eve, completely naked, petting the serpent who is curled around the tree. The artist used vibrant colors, and there are animals that appear to be calm and happy. Another interesting fact about this painting is that Eve is depicted with dark skin, unlike most depictions of Eve.

My main takeaway from visiting the Ackland is that art has many more connections to literature and life than I previously believed. There are many different ways of viewing art and thinking about art that might not be so obvious at first glance.

Ackland Art Museum Experience

In elementary school, my class would take field trips each year to the multiple museums in North Carolina and it was always my favorite part of the year. Therefore, going to the Ackland Art Museum was such an enjoyable experience. The first piece of art my group observed and my favorite from the trip was, “River Landscape with Fishermen.” At first glance, I was amazed by the detail of this piece. The water was peaceful enough it reflected the trees in the background, and the people in the sailboat had no look of fear. It took a minute for me to notice the grey clouds in the sky that could be leading to a storm or some other danger. I saw this piece as the “calm before the storm,” but it was interesting to hear my classmate’s ideas about this painting as well. Viewing art with other people is a thought-provoking experience as you get to see and hear how someone else sees the same piece of art.

When we had finished looking at that piece of art, we moved on to a piece called, “The Batture Ritual.” I had personally never seen a piece of video art before, so this was intriguing to me. As we watched the video, I realized that I was not as fond of this type of art. I think that although the idea behind the video was interesting, I did not enjoy watching it. Different from the first piece of art I observed, this one was almost eerie. I felt as though I was on the edge of my seat while watching the clip because it seemed as if someone was going to jump in front of the screen. This piece was definitely more modern than the other considering it was made in 2017, and the first piece I saw was made in 1812. I think that the look of the first piece makes me believe more thought and detail was put into it, although I know the video took a great amount of time also. Making sure the angle, the background, and much more are perfect before recording would be a tedious process. I think that in the future I will watch different video art, and see how my opinion differs when the video is more appealing to me.

After seeing these two pieces, I was also able to observe a few more. Personally, “River Landscape with Fishermen” was my favorite, and “The Batture Ritual” was my least favorite. Going to the museum and being able to analyze the stories and details of each piece was an awesome experience that even brought back old memories!